 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0u6HX5-000072C; Mon, 8 Apr 96 09:03 CDT |
| Comment: |
MEMO 1996/04/08 10:05 |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
08 Apr 1996 09:03:09 EST |
| From [log in to unmask] Mon Apr 8 09: |
42:57 1996 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"poxXs3.0.EIA.MoHQn"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Can anyone provide guidance on the design of a conductor
width such that it will not be damaged by a high current
spike. I want to feel confident that, if a short occurs in
the system, the conductor will not degrade before the
fuse has a chance to do it's thing. So, this is not really
a derating question as much as one of short term overload.
Thank You,
Andy Pedersen
Harris Corp.
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|
