TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Water Mark
From:
[log in to unmask]
Date:
Tue, 7 May 1996 09:39:48 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines) 
Ok..... I'll answer my own question. After a little research, I discovered
the following. My supplier lead me to believe that these specs had been
recently revised. They were wrong.

First - MIL-P-13949 F, paragraph 3.8 included a requirement for a water mark.
Rev G (released in 1987) omitted the requirement in paragraph 3.8.

Third - IPC-L -115 B, requirements are word for word from paragraph 3.8 of
MIL-P-13949 G

ATOM RSS1 RSS2