 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0uGmtR-0000BqC; Tue, 7 May 96 08:33 CDT |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Tue, 7 May 1996 09:39:48 -0400 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Wed May 15 16: |
35:50 1996 |
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"lel8k1.0.oG7.i4rZn"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| Message-ID: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Ok..... I'll answer my own question. After a little research, I discovered
the following. My supplier lead me to believe that these specs had been
recently revised. They were wrong.
First - MIL-P-13949 F, paragraph 3.8 included a requirement for a water mark.
Rev G (released in 1987) omitted the requirement in paragraph 3.8.
Third - IPC-L -115 B, requirements are word for word from paragraph 3.8 of
MIL-P-13949 G
|
|
|
