TECHNET Archives

June 2020

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 15 Jun 2020 10:29:09 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (61 lines)
Hi Rich-

I'm unfamiliar with this type of product. Are you sure you are talking
about encapsulation, or are you thinking "underfill".

The "usual way" of making a BGA-based module which can be reflowed is to
first underfill the BGA. That is very complicated to implement. For low
quantity stuff, where you can't do the massive qualification necessary to
get the underfill process fully validated, most of us just let the BGA
reflow with no encapsulation or underfill.

Trying to get away without full qualification of the underfill process will
lead to much misery. The underfill system includes:

   - The material on the bottom of the BGA
   - The soldermask on the PCB the BGA is reflowed to
   - Flux chemistry
   - Cleaning chemistry and effectiveness

System failure usually results in a tiny crack opening up at either the BGA
surface or the PCB soldermask. The underfill mechanical characteristics at
high temperatures usually ends up causing pressure on the molten solder.
This molten solder then flows into the cracks and creates amazing shorts
that are very difficult to see on X-Ray inspection.

Even just getting proper underfill flow and cure can be a big job. Several
years ago I was responsible for a line doing this and learned that
incredibly small amounts of moisture in the PCB material can force its way
into the underfill chemistry because of the captured volume beneath the
BGA. The result is a new substance that has no redeeming qualities for the
underfill situation!

Good Luck!

Wayne Thayer

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 8:16 AM Richard Kraszewski <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> I have a potential need for a reflow encapsulant for a BGA
> Had reached out  to Henkel  but was informed that they had  discontinued
> that  product line.
> Anyone have a different source?
>
> Rich  Kraszewski
> Senior Staff Process Engineer
> Plexus
>
> * * * * * * * * CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE * * * * * * * *
>
> This e-mail and any attachments are confidential from Plexus Corp. and may
> contain information which is privileged, confidential, and/or protected by
> non-disclosure agreements.  They are intended solely for the use of the
> named addressee(s).  .  Any unauthorized use or disclosure may be
> unlawful.  If you are not a named addressee, you must not use, disclose,
> retain or reproduce all or any part of the information contained in this
> e-mail or any attachments If you have received this transmission in error,
> please destroy it and notify us immediately by return e-mail or by calling
> + 1 888 208 9005.
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2