 
| Received: |
by ipchq.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0sxdnD-0000HYC; Tue, 26 Sep 95 12:27 CDT |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
26 Sep 1995 12:28:53 -0600 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| X-Loop: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"qpjnd3.0.QyF.kV3Qm"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Resent-From: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 14: |
53:30 1996 |
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Subject: Time:10:23 AM
OFFICE MEMO None Date:9/26/95
Jim Marsico asked:
Can anyone tell me the correlation between micrograms/square centimeter and
resistivity for PWB cleanliness?
Look in IPC-TM-650, 2.3.26.1, Ionizable Detection of Surface Contamination
(Static Method). This test method shows the formula for the relationship
between solution resistivity (starting and ending) and micrograms/sq. in.
The formula is also in our Omegameter 600SMD owners manual.
Mary Davis
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|
