Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0wnlv7-000BkFC; Mon, 14 Jul 97 09:16 CDT |
Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 11 Jul 1997 10:02:39 -0700 |
Precedence: |
list |
Reply-To: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Status: |
O |
Priority: |
Normal |
From [log in to unmask] Mon Jul 14 13: |
21:32 1997 |
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
X-Status: |
|
X-Loop: |
|
X-Mailing-List: |
|
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"rrXpN1.0.L_I.bIZop"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Resent-From: |
|
>From willli Mon Jul 14 09: |
16:46 1997 |
cc: |
|
Message-Id: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Fri, 11 Jul 1997 06:16:37 -0700 [log in to unmask] wrote:
> From: [log in to unmask]> Date: Fri, 11 Jul 1997 06:16:37 -0700
> Subject: Re: Test and Inspection Strategy
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
> Hi Vikcha and Thomas,
> Most likely the lack of responses comes from the large number of questions to
> which there are no real good clear cut answers.
{some other interesting comments deleted}
OK, I'll generalize my question a bit more:
I am interested in talking to anyone who has any sort of experience, good or
bad, with any automated equipment for inspecting solder joints on PCA's.
Optical, laser, Xray, or other....
Thanks,
-- Vickie Chapman
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To subscribe/unsubscribe send a message <to: [log in to unmask]> *
* with <subject: subscribe/unsubscribe> and no text in the body. *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask] *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|