 
| Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Tue, 24 Dec 1996 14:29:34 -0700 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Mon Dec 30 08: |
35:01 1996 |
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"GnfFb3.0.xXF.5d4mo"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0vceJi-0000TWC; Tue, 24 Dec 96 15:23 CST |
| X-Mailer: |
Microsoft Mail via PostalUnion/SMTP for Windows NT |
| Message-ID: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
----------
From: Larry Morse
To: D. Rooke
Subject: RE: Component attrition
Date: Tuesday, December 24, 1996 9:27AM
Some components are lost during automated placement due to lack of
original tape leader, feeder mis-feeds, component sensing rejects, defects
from missing solder paste or adhesive on the PCB, as well as other reasons.
These components still exist undamaged, but are in a loose format and mixed
with other components, and so it isn't economical to use them for automated
board assembly. If you know of a manufacturer that gets 100% yield, 100% of
the time, without this sort of attrition on high volume assembly, I'd be
very interested to know if they would like some more contract work.
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask] *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|
