 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0tJspw-0000GgC; Sun, 26 Nov 95 19:58 CST |
| Old-Return-Path: |
<miso!aol.com!SSSeelig> |
| Date: |
Fri, 24 Nov 1995 22:47:17 -0500 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| X-Loop: |
|
| Message-ID: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 15: |
20:59 1996 |
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"9HYy13.0.FWG.2jHkm"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| Resent-From: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I appologize for the confusion. The drying I am referring to is after
aqueous and /or semi-aqueous cleaning. So far, in my paper I am covering
physical and chemical methods of drying that exist today. This includes air
knives, convention ovens, vacuum drying, cetrifical drying, alcohol and
displacement drying. Any comments....
Stan Seelig
Seelig and Associates, Inc.
Industrial Cleaning Consultants
|
|
|
