 
| Sender: |
|
| X-To: |
|
| Date: |
Fri, 17 May 2013 18:16:37 +0300 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Message-ID: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| In-Reply-To: |
<E7D3176B82F34EBAB196CCD0BEA04714@stephenPC> |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed |
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Good evening, all!
I personally would be very sceptical, indeed, of ANY w/s mask in a
closed loop system. It is asking for reduced lifetime of carbon and/or
DI columns. I would suggest open loop pre-cleaning and use the closed
loop just to polish off. Alternatively, a membrane microfilter before
the first column, but this will require frequent backwash de-clogging.
Brian
On 17.05.2013 16:08, Steve Gregory wrote:
> Morning all,
>
> Continuing on with the masking thread, I know Techspray has a water soluble mask that is supposed to be compatible with closed-loop water treatment systems, are there any others out there?
>
> Any pros/cons of using them?
>
> As always, thanks in advance!
>
> Steve
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
