 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0trDqr-00008KC; Mon, 26 Feb 96 19:05 CST |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Mon, 26 Feb 1996 20:09:14 -0500 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| X-Loop: |
|
| Message-ID: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"vQehd1.0.fvB.8ZbCn"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Tue Feb 27 08: |
53:01 1996 |
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| Resent-From: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Has anyone attempted to use a Time Domain Reflectometer (TDR) to
measure the "effective dielectric" constant of internal Stripline and
Dualstripline signals?
Are the calculated dielectric constants close to what the laminate
supplier states or are they higher for FR4.
Richard Nolan
RGNolan Consulting
607-754-0079
|
|
|
