TECHNET Archives

July 2012

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
[log in to unmask]
Date:
Wed, 11 Jul 2012 08:17:26 -0500
Reply-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, John Balchunas <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Ionic Contamination Test for Non-clean PCBA, is it really necessary?
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
From:
John Balchunas <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (4 lines) 
I have had boards tested with Foresite's C3 to extract and test contamination at specific sites, and under components, which might otherwise be missed by an Ionograph test.  Here is a link to the info.

http://www.residues.com/pdfs/Localized_Contamination.pdf

ATOM RSS1 RSS2