Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 16 Aug 2012 08:50:37 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Simply brush a very thin layer of a good tacky flux such as Alpha WS1208 over the pads prior to placement. Even a very thin layer of this flux will be more than enough to allow good wetting to the pads.
-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Amol Kane (Asteelflash,US)
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 8:34 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [TN] CSP BGAs
Dear Technetters,
We are going to be assembling some lead-free 1.6x0.8 mm micro BGAs with 0.5mm pitch and 0.17mm dia board pads. Anybody else have experience with this small a package?....I am concerned that there won't be sufficient flux in the tiny solder deposit to clean the oxides during reflow, leading to graping and/or head in pillow situation. Do I need a dip fluxer for the part to do a flux only attachment, or to augment the amount of flux in the solderpaste-solder bump system? I am told I have no time to do DOEs to determine stencil and reflow parameters, so I am turning to technet for help.....any thoughts?
Regards,
Amol
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] ______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
|
|
|