TECHNET Archives

1995

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0t6fnu-0000GvC; Sat, 21 Oct 95 10:25 CDT
Old-Return-Path:
<miso!compuserve.com!100537.2615>
Date:
21 Oct 95 08:51:12 EDT
Precedence:
list
X-Loop:
Resent-Sender:
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/44
From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 15:
10:28 1996
TO:
Return-Path:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"5TkM4.0.TpI.r3HYm"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
Robert Willis <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Resent-From:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
I have been running the wave soldering courses for Electrovert for 8 years, I
have worked in sub contract manufcatre for two years and before that 15 years in
a major OEM. Wave soldering of SOIC devices is not a problem. There has been far
more problems with SOT23 and pasive components.

Soldering QFP devices may need some baking prior to wave soldering. Provided you
evaluate the comoponents prior to use, test there process compatability it is
not a problem.

There are hundreds of users wave soldering SOIC devices, not always well but
that is another issue. During workshops on soldering I conducted 5 years ago in
your country many of the assembly plants were running SOIC devices through the
wave,

Bob Willis
Tel 01245 351502
Fax 01245 496123



ATOM RSS1 RSS2