TECHNET Archives

April 2002

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Bloomquist, Ken" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Tue, 30 Apr 2002 06:13:17 -0700
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (394 bytes) , text/html (940 bytes)
I wonder how long it would take the component manufacturers to start marking
date codes again if a problem was found within a part and they either had to
test everything they had to sort out the problem and throw everything away
and start over? I agree that having the suppliers sort for date codes
because of assumed solderability problems is a problem but there really
needs to be a date code.

KennyB


ATOM RSS1 RSS2