TECHNET Archives

March 2000

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Proportional Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Subject:
From:
"Fred S. Shubert" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 2 Mar 2000 16:59:51 -0500
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_002D_01BF8468.B9CC4360"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
"TechNet E-Mail Forum." <[log in to unmask]>, "Fred S. Shubert" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (911 bytes) , text/html (1291 bytes)
I hope you don't mind my adding my two cents, but for what its worth the only thing water tells you about the surface is how "Polar" it is, as has already been mentioned. If the water spreads over the surface without breaking up into droplets, one can assume that whatever is on the surface is extremely polar. Copper is considered very hydrophobic in the printing industry as they use it for printing plates in lithography (oil based inks). Clean copper is very hydrophillic for a short period of time and then it will pick up whatever is in the atmosphere (the room that its in or associated with). A misleading reaction to water spreading is caused by chemical and/or mechanical cleaning which roughens the surface sufficiently to allow water to spread. This roughening also allows adhesives to adhere better due to the increased surface area, but you can still have contaminants on the surface. 


ATOM RSS1 RSS2