 
| Received: |
by ipchq.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0snTZx-0000GmC; Tue, 29 Aug 95 11:32 CDT |
| Sender: |
|
| Old-Return-Path: |
<miso!gac.usa.com!HYBISKE> |
| Date: |
Tue, 29 Aug 1995 11:55:24 |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"msHVY3.0.T2I.-3qGm"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 14: |
40:28 1996 |
| X-mhsfile: |
ALDFBNFL |
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Reference IPC-D-275, para 5.3.2.3, Table 5-10
When calculating annular ring requirements, table 5-10 lists "Greatest
Board, X,Y Dimension". The table uses this to list a manufacturing
allowance. The larger the dimensions, the larger the allowance. Is
this the actual board dimensions, or is it the panel size that is
being used?
Thanks,
Tom Hybiske
General Atronics Corp.
|
|
|
