TECHNET Archives

February 2014

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
X-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Richard Kraszewski <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 09:56:24 +0200
Reply-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
From:
Brian Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (57 lines)
Good point re CaCl2 used for deicing. As you probably know, in a former 
life I made the Microcontaminometer. With the smallest tank, it could 
measure down to picograms NaCl equivalent. I had some thoroughly cleaned 
samples, 1" x 1" ceramic hybrid wafers, on my bench for testing. 
Suddenly, they showed ionic contamination levels much higher than they 
should have, which puzzled me. I was pondering on this when I saw a salt 
(NaCl) sprinkler going along the road and light dawned. The tyres of 
cars passing kicked up an aerosol of slush and salt that presumably 
evaporated leaving a suspension of submicroscopic salt crystals that 
floated everywhere including into my lab, which was a good 20 m from the 
road (and the windows were shut!). This hypothesis was confirmed on a 
number of subsequent occasions.

Similarly, I had a customer in Rennes at the foot of the Brittany 
peninsula, about 50 km from the coast. He told me that his PCBs showed 
consistently slightly higher ionic contamination readings when a violent 
north-westerly Atlantic storm was raging.

However, tap water is the most probable source of Ca.

I'm afraid that 1 ppm is meaningless as such unless we know the area 
from which the aliquot was derived. 1 ppm from a sample the size of an 
A4 paper sheet would be bugger all in terms of reliability but it may be 
a different story if the sample was a small passive component.

Brian

On 11.02.2014 00:08, Richard Kraszewski wrote:
> I am occasionally seeing irritating low levels of calcium in some assemblies that we test via ion chromatography.
>
> Some organizations required spec levels as low as <1 ppm.
>
> My questions to you techies is:
>
> #1 Besides wash water are there any other sources of calcium that come to  mind?
>
> #2 is there any real value in having Calcium specs down as low as 1 ppm?  (I suspect not and this spec was merely carried over from the semiconductor industry where it may have more value)
>
> CH65 is of some help here in that is does speak much more of the evils of Na that Ca& Mg, but not as much as I had hoped.
>
> Thoughts??
>
> Rich� Kraszewski
> Senior Process Engineer
> Plexus Engineering Solutions
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
> ______________________________________________________________________
>

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2