TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Wed, 24 Jan 1996 13:04:49 +0000
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
From [log in to unmask] Tue Jan 30 10:
15:56 1996
Cc:
turnerj@prut
X-Status:
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/2324
TO:
Return-Path:
Resent-Sender:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"MF_-J.0.CdE.UtY1n"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
"Terry Davey" <[log in to unmask]>
X-Loop:
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0tf4qF-0000PBC; Wed, 24 Jan 96 07:02 CST
X-Mailer:
Z-Mail (3.0.0 15dec93)
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)
Does anyone out there have experience/knowledge of mating gold-plate edge
contacts (on SIMMS - so dry contacts) with tinned connectors. Is it a no-no
from a long-term reliability point of view?

We have a first source with tinned edge contacts (matching the connector) and
are lokking at a gold-plate second source.

Terry Davey                               [log in to unmask]



ATOM RSS1 RSS2