TECHNET Archives

January 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Tue, 14 Jan 1997 15:43:45 -0500
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
X-Status:
Status:
O
From [log in to unmask] Tue Jan 14 16:
29:02 1997
X-Sender:
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
Resent-Message-ID:
<"G9Vx52.0.OR6._r-so"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Jack Crawford)
X-Loop:
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0vkFXc-0000UPC; Tue, 14 Jan 97 14:33 CST
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/9209
Message-Id:
<v01540b10af0159d3bff2@[204.180.62.40]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (63 lines)
Following from EMPF IPC-A-610 Master Instructor Linda Zellars:

>J-STD-001B specifies under para.9.2.1.1 When the outer, lower edge of land
>areas are lifted or separated more than the thickness (height) of the land
>the printed wiring board must be rejected.  This also means that if it is
>lifted less than the thickness of the land it is acceptable.
>
For more info, contact the EMPF directly at the address in the signature
file at the end of this msg.
>
>At 03:27 PM 1/14/97 -0500, you wrote:
>>>Resent-Date: Tue, 14 Jan 1997 03:05:53 -0800
>>>Resent-Sender: [log in to unmask]
>>>Old-Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>Date: Tue, 14 Jan 1997 10:52:18 +0200 (IST)
>>>From: Yakov Steinberg <[log in to unmask]>
>>>To: [log in to unmask]
>>>Subject: lifed pads
>>>Resent-From: [log in to unmask]
>>>X-Mailing-List: <[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/9179
>>>X-Loop: [log in to unmask]
>>>Precedence: list
>>>Resent-Sender: [log in to unmask]
>>>
>>>Fellow Technetters:
>>>
>>>What is the "rule" regarding lifted pads on multilayer boards?  We have
>>>always scrapped them.  A subcontractor recently returned a few of our
>>>boards which had lifted pads.  We follow IPC-A-610B class II.  The subject
>>>is not mentioned.
>>>
>>>
>>>Comments are appreciated.
>>>
>>>Ellen Berkman
>>>Excalibur Systems

***ALL NEW EMPF PHONE NUMBERS***

                      Jack Crawford
                  HelpLine Manager
    Electronics Mfg. Productivity Facility
****NEW--317.655.3688--NEW****
*****FAX  317-655-3699 NEW ****
          714 N Senate Ave, Suite 100
         Indianapolis IN  46202-3112
          VISIT OUR HOME PAGE AT:
                http://www.empf.org
            [log in to unmask]


***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2