Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Sat, 21 Oct 95 14:00:18 EST |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Al Slagle,
PCB shops amaze me sometimes, one minute they want to remove
non-functional lands, the next minute they want to add thieving
(robber bars) to low density areas to assist plating thicknesses and
the Z-axis thickness (especially for thick copper boards). What up
with these guys! Is it really necessary to remove these lands if no
holes are drilled at that location.
Correction! Holes are drilled at this location. A
non-functional pad is an inner layer pad (with a hole) that
has no traces associated with it at that layer. That is why
these non-anchored pads may float during lamination. The
hole is most definitely there.
Thieving is an entirely different issue. This typically is
requested on outer layers where plating is involved. If the
copper to be plated is imbalanced, overplating or burnt
plating sometimes occurs on isolated features in order to
get enough plating to the dense areas of the outer layers.
That's "What (sic) up with these guys!"
Hey, maybe we can start removing non functional conductors
that are difficult to remove with most CAD systems.
But with all fairness, I worked for a respected PCB shop and now work
for a very respected assembly shop and in many ways I understand the
perils each side. Guess what, I'm still a strong advocate for PCB
vendors.
Thomas John Gulley
PCB Project Coordinator
email: [log in to unmask]
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: pull-pads
Author: [log in to unmask] at halsic_ccsmtp
Date: 10/19/95 8:20 AM
Al Slagle wrote:
__________________________________________________________________
>AS DESIGNERS, WE OFTEN REMOVE SPECIFIC INTERNAL PADS BECAUSE OF DESIGN
>CONSIDERATIONS; HIGH VOLTAGE, DENSITY PROBLEMS, RIGID-FLEX PCB'S, >WHATEVER.
>BUT, WHEN FAB SHOPS WANT TO DO SO WE BAULK.
>WE HAVE TO PULL PADS TO CREATE A VALID PCB DESIGN.
>THEY WISH TO PULL PADS TO INCREASE THEIR YIELDS.
>SO THE NEXT LOGICAL QUESTION IS; IF YOU ARE GOING INCREASE YOUR YIELDS AND
>INCREASE YOUR PROFITS WHEN PRODUCING OUR BOARDS. ARE YOU ALSO GOING TO
>PASS ALONG SOME OF THE SAVINGS BACK TO YOUR CUSTOMERS??
>TELL US HOW MUCH WE MIGHT BE LOWERING OUR COSTS, AND THEN LET'S DECIDE.
>AL SLAGLE
>CAD DESIGNER
>HONEYWELL DASD
____________________________________________________________________
If the pads are pulled is the design invalid???
maybe sometimes but not always.
If your design causes a decrease in yields will you pay more for the
product, if an alternative design does not have a detrimental efect?
Why would you baulk if the change does not impact performance?
brian
|
|
|