 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0u9bu3-0000B9C; Wed, 17 Apr 96 13:24 CDT |
| Encoding: |
21 Text |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Wed, 17 Apr 96 10:50:00 CST |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Cc: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"OymZS2.0.srC.UTJTn"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Wed Apr 24 17: |
17:53 1996 |
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I am also interested in this information, please copy me on your replies
as well.
Thanks, Gita
[log in to unmask]
MIL-55110 HAS A REQUIREMENT, PARA. 3.6.2.1.1 THAT REQUIRES MINIMUM
ANNULAR RING OF 0.002" ON INTERNAL PADS. DOES ANYONE HAVE DATA THAT THEY
CAN SHARE WHICH DEMONSTRATES THE RELIABILITY OR UNRELIABILITY OF PLATED
HOLE BREAK OUT OR TANGENCY TO THE INTERNAL PADS. DOES ETCHBACK AFFECT
RELIABILITY ON PTH'S WITH BREAKOUT?
Kevin Facinelli
Rockwell Collins Printed Circuits
400 Collins Rd NE
Cedar Rapids, IA 52498
P: 319-395-1594
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|
