TECHNET Archives

October 1998

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Subject:
From:
Frank Hinojos <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 12 Oct 1998 09:10:46 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To:
"TechNet E-Mail Forum." <[log in to unmask]>, Frank Hinojos <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
     What are the failure mechanisms for stacked chip components.  If heat
     dissipation is accounted for with stacking, then is it strictly stress
     relief at the solder joints?

     If it is stress relief at the solder joints, then why do IPC spec's
     allow such bulbous joints for parts that aren't stacked?

     Would the failure occur at the chip-to-board interface or at the
     chip-to-chip interface?  Has anyone actually found stacking to be a
     problem or is it more of a theoretical argument?

     We design RF systems and would like to stack chips (especially caps)
     for tuning purposes.

     Frank Hinojos

################################################################
TechNet E-Mail Forum provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8c
################################################################
To subscribe/unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in the body:
To subscribe:   SUBSCRIBE TechNet <your full name>
To unsubscribe:   SIGNOFF TechNet 
################################################################
Please visit IPC's web site (http://www.ipc.org) "On-Line Services" section for additional information.
For technical support contact Hugo Scaramuzza at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.312
################################################################


ATOM RSS1 RSS2