TECHNET Archives

October 2015

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: IPC-A-610
From:
James Head <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, James Head <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 21 Oct 2015 08:14:36 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines) 
A note "Shall meet IPC Class x ,blah blah, except where precluded by original design" doesn't sound like the correct approach to me - it could unintentionally result in the designer not getting vital feedback from the fabricator and assembler.

I think highlighting particular areas on a specific design with a note is better - like holding your hand up to say "look I know this is going to be an issue here but spent time looking at it and I've ruled out every alternative".

As I designer I want to know if I've caused an issue and have the chance to rectify it.

Regards,
James

James Head BEng CID+ MIIE MIET 
Senior PCB CAD Engineer
Crowcon Detection Instruments Limited
172 Brook Drive
Milton Park
OX14 4SD
Telephone: +44 (1235) 557700 ext. 7885
E-mail: [log in to unmask]


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2