TECHNET Archives

December 2012

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 5 Dec 2012 12:42:54 -0800
Reply-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, "Reyes, Angel LAM2 4429" <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
PCB assembly potted evaluation validation
From:
"Reyes, Angel LAM2 4429" <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
In-Reply-To:
<C2E0F33D94144FA2AA701DA682750098@stephenPC>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines) 
Hello TechNetters;

Does any one know or recommend any test standard to validate performance and reliability for PCB (FR4 0.031" THCK) double side SMT assemblies potted with epoxy or polyurethane

Regards,
Angel

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2