Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:49:28 -0600 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
In-Reply-To: |
<000001c7af60$c3572d20$6c01a8c0@smw626e71658ad> |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Thin flex attached on aluminum probably would work, but the real
question with this would be how flat can we get it as there is a
reflector that has to sit flush against the pcb and which surrounds each
LED.
At this point, I believe the mechanical design team is pretty rigid, so
flex is out of the question. (Yaaaa It is Friday!)
Nila
-----Original Message-----
From: Hfjord [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 9:21 AM
To: 'TechNet E-Mail Forum'; Nila Young
Subject: SV: [TN] MCPCB finish questions
Won't a thin flex attached on aluminum do the same job? If it must be
cheap, I think Ruwel can use LCP instead. We made some sort of battery
charge/control circuit this way.
(I don't say this to make John Burke crazy)
Inge
---------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 15.0
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
To temporarily halt or (re-start) delivery of Technet send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet NOMAIL or (MAIL)
To receive ONE mailing per day of all the posts: send e-mail to [log in to unmask]: SET Technet Digest
Search the archives of previous posts at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives
Please visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16 for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
-----------------------------------------------------
|
|
|