TECHNET Archives

June 1998

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
superflx <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Thu, 25 Jun 1998 15:19:30 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1107 bytes) , text/html (1657 bytes)
If you use a No-Clean flux with clean, fresh components and new HAL or
OSP boards, the nitrogen will add, marginally, to the process.  If you
use a water-soluble flux, the nitrogen does not add anything as the flux
will overcome any oxidation problems.

Our experiuence has been that Nitrogen doesn't necessarily add anything
to the soldering process, but helps reduce drossing of solder.  If
reducing dross can help save money relative to the cost of nitrogen,
then its a worthwhile investment.

Phil

Jesper Kjærnulf Konge wrote:

>    At our factory we are going to have a new waesolderingmachine with
> nitrogensupport. But our director dosen't think that we need the
> nitrogen because it has no effect compared to the price that we have
> to pay. But in me department we dosen't aggree.   I would like to hear
> about your experience with nitrogen so that we can tell our director
> that it isn't just us that thinks that nitrogen soldering is good. And
> if anyone has a meaning about the Seho MWS-8200 PWR i would like to
> hear that too. With Regards Jesper KongeDanica Supply A/SDenmark Mail
> : [log in to unmask]




ATOM RSS1 RSS2