Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Wed, 8 May 1996 13:59:03 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
John,
I would be concerned if I were you (customer viewpoint). We would not
accept boards in that kind of shape regardless of how they have
flattened out under weight. The degree of twist indicates that
additional stresses have been placed on the material which could
affect fit after assembly. When placed under additional stress on the
reflow/wave solder line the board could twist up even more (or it
might flatten out). I would be scared to try and place any high
density QFP's on that board (my QA and MFG departments would kill me
if I tried to send them something like that). We have had
circumstances where even if a board is heavy enough to flatten itself
(or is screwed down by ~20 screws per side to a stiffener) then the
board still won't fit with other boards in the assembly unless it was
flat to begin with.
Currently, with some of our suppliers, we are having them bake our
boards after final test to ensure there will be no warp when received
(based upon past problems).
I don't really care what the accepted (or industry standard) specs
might be, if there is an obvious problem, I will reject it.
Regards,
Roger Held
Manager of Electrical Component Engineering
Hitachi Computer Products (America), Inc.
[log in to unmask]
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Bow and Twist
Author: [log in to unmask] at Internet-HICAM-OK
Date: 5/8/96 6:17 PM
A question on interpretation of the IPC method IPC-TM-650, 2.4.22.
I have a batch of boards 400mm square, which are quite clearly twisted when
held free in my hands. When I lay a board horizontal, it straightens under
its own weight. All corners touch the plane and I am left with a small
residual bow of 1 to 2mm, say 0.25 to 0.5%.
My supplier says it is in specification, but my customer (who cannot carry
out the prescribed test on the populated board) comments on the degree of twist.
Questions:
1) Is this the correct interpretation of the test and specification?
2) Should I be concerned?
Regards
John Loveluck
Tadpole Technology
Cambridge
United Kingdom
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|