TECHNET Archives

October 2000

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Date:
Fri, 13 Oct 2000 14:49:54 -0400
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
"TechNet E-Mail Forum." <[log in to unmask]>, "Kane, Joseph" <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain
Subject:
From:
"Kane, Joseph" <[log in to unmask]>
X-cc:
"Hartford Jr, Theodore R" <[log in to unmask]>
Content-transfer-encoding:
7BIT
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
Anyone have an opinion about whether periodic testing of irons is warranted,
and if so,
how often?  Newer specs and handbooks don't address this.

For the record, we still apply an old military requirement, and test each
iron every 3
months for tip-to-ground resistance (<2 ohms), potential from tip to ground
(<2 millivolts),
and temperature variation at rest (+/- 10 degrees).  Most of ours are
Metcal, and the
pass rate is better than 98%.  Those that fail usually do so for tip
resistance slightly OHL.

Iron manufacturers have told me (off the record) that these limits don't
mean a whole
lot in practice; when DOD came after them years ago, the manufacturers
proposed these
numbers because they knew they could meet them.

Joe Kane
BAE Systems Controls
Johnson City, NY

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TechNet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF TECHNET
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2