 
| Received: |
by ipchq.com (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0t0rBG-0000I4C; Thu, 5 Oct 95 09:21 CDT |
| Old-Return-Path: |
<miso!norden.com!vanech> |
| Date: |
Thu, 5 Oct 95 06:50:54 EDT |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Cc: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| From [log in to unmask] Sat Apr 27 15: |
00:07 1996 |
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"i079Y2.0.fkD.zd-Sm"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| Message-Id: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Jim....
My main concern would be the end product requirement for the trace,
which I believe should be its final cross sectional area and relationship
between its current carrying capacity and intented use. Therefore, I would
consider this to be a 6.0 mil finished line in my calculations for end
product requirements and let the pundits debate how to measure the trace.
Bob Vanech
Bob Vanech
Norden Systems
Norwalk, Ct.
(203) 852-4810
|
|
|
