TECHNET Archives

September 2001

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Paste verses tacky flux
From:
Guy Ramsey <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 7 Sep 2001 13:25:39 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0006_01C137A0.95EB37C0"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
"TechNet E-Mail Forum." <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (323 bytes) , text/html (1131 bytes) 
Anyone out there with data, case study, anecdotal evidence, strong opinions,
relative to installation of PBGA components (with eutectic solder balls of
course) using micro stencil and solder paste verses tacky flux.

Guy Ramsey
Senior Lab Technician / Instructor


E-Mail: [log in to unmask]
Ph: (610) 362-1200 x107
Fax: (610) 362-1290

ATOM RSS1 RSS2