TECHNET Archives

June 2012

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
X-To:
Date:
Fri, 29 Jun 2012 08:00:59 -0500
Reply-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Message-ID:
Subject:
From:
Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
base64
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
Brian,

   Thanks for sharing your comments.   I would like some sort of official standard are document stated the permissible plating scheme for press fit connectors.   As others have stated that the hole drill size is critical.   I have also notice different designs of press fit pins eyelids and at different depth with regards to the shank length.   I have measured the Ni thickness on several different vendor connector and all with different thickness.   One print di confirm tin over plated with nickel but not thickness criteria.

Victor,

-----Original Message-----
From: TechNet [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Brian Chandler
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 6:58 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [TN] Press Fit Pins on ENIG raw board

I would expect the retention force to be low with the Ni to Ni interface along with the cracking issue previously mentioned.

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2