Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 24 Feb 2017 12:01:51 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 (1.0) |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Steve,
A good source of consulting income if you choose v scoring. I am now retired and available :-)
John
Sent from my iPad
> On Feb 24, 2017, at 11:46 AM, Steve Gregory <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Good Morning all,
>
> We're about to build a MCPCB (Metal Core) and I'm having a little issue
> about panelizing it. It's a little teardrop shaped board about 1.5" wide by
> 3.5" long. So I did a panel drawing for the board shop to panelize this for
> me:
>
> http://stevezeva.homestead.com/Aluminum_Core_PCB.jpg
>
> I have one board shop telling me that the v-score is the best way to go as
> far as being able to depanelize it after building it, and I have another
> board shop telling me that a tab routed mousebite is the way to go because
> a v-score will make the panel too flimsy. So what is your take on it? The
> board has doubl sided SMT
>
> I've built metal core boards before at a past employer but they weren't
> panelized, so I'm not quite sure how stable it might be with a v-score, or
> how difficult it would be to singulate with a mousebite. Also we do almost
> all of our depaneling here manually, we don't have anything but a foot
> operated pneumatic tab nibbler.
>
> Any input is appreciated,
>
> Steve
>
> --
>
>
> This email and any attachments are only for use by the intended
> recipient(s) and may contain legally privileged, confidential, proprietary
> or otherwise private information. Any unauthorized use, reproduction,
> dissemination, distribution or other disclosure of the contents of this
> e-mail or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the
> original.
|
|
|