TECHNET Archives

September 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
TechNet Mail Forum<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Rejected by Custodian
From:
SMTPGATE <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 4 Sep 1997 09:24:49 -0400
Reply-To:
"TechNet Mail Forum." <[log in to unmask]>, SMTPGATE <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines) 
Mail*Link¨ SMTP               [TECHNET] FREEZE-IT 2000 spray VS static charge

Hello technetters!

A QA partner have a question related to ESD:

We are using FREEZE-IT 2000 to debug and test some of our products.  I was
told by a technician that this product generates a lot of static when
applied and therefore maybe harmfull to electrostatic discharge sensitive
(ESDS) components.
Would it be necessary for me to eliminate the use of this product?

If anyone of you has any information or answer, it would be greathly
appreciated.
-------------------------------------------------
Patrick Ducas
Process Quality Engineer
Matrox Electronic Systems Ltd
E-mail: [log in to unmask]
TŽl:(514)969-6000 ext.2971   Fax:(514)685-3415
-------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2