TECHNET Archives

September 2015

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
[log in to unmask]
Date:
Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:13:37 -0500
Reply-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Subject:
Supported & Unsupported holes
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From:
Victor Hernandez <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines) 
Fellow TechNetters:

   Is it safe to stated that a SUPPORTED hole contains a plated through BARREL and an UNSUPPORTED holes does not contain a plated through BARREL...   I am measuring the hole break out on an external PTH annular ring.   IPC-2221  Figure 9-2 & Table 9-2.

Victor,


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2