TECHNET Archives

August 2019

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Jack Olson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 27 Aug 2019 17:48:51 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (56 lines)
On Sat, 24 Aug 2019 10:55:55 -0700, Wayne Thayer <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>Dave,
>
>I beg to differ....
>
>Specifying caps when they aren't required by your application invites
>unnecessary risk.
>
>First, specifying anything which has no inherent benefit to the design is
>poor "systems engineering" practice.
>
>Second, plated caps aren't simply like asking for extra nuts on your ice
>cream sundae: It specifies a completely different plating layup: If no
>caps, the outer metal surface of all conductors and pads is plated at the
>same time the via walls are plated. This is a very good thing since it is
>easy to get plenty of "wrap" at the corner between the plated via and the
>surface metal. If you demand plated caps, then two separate plating cycles
>are needed. You may think that is no problem, but it creates a natural
>place to crack the via rim. This is why IPC specifies a minimum "wrap
>plate". This "wrap plate" is typically achieved by overplating a "doughnut"
>around the via. That "doughnut" creates a bump on the top surface which
>creates problems for photoresist, imaging, and etching. To reduce the bump,
>fabricators use some kind of abrasive process to thin it down to close to
>the IPC required minimum wrap plate. But that is a very difficult process
>to control, and I have seen large variations in "wrap plate" across a panel.
>
>Since most customers of fabricators don't seem to have the capacity to
>understand the above, fabricators have responded by defaulting to plated
>caps if you request complete fill.
>
>Wayne Thayer
>
>On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 10:39 AM Dave Schaefer <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> Jack,
>>
>> Save yourself some trouble and spec VII filled and capped.
>> Gives the added benefit of protecting from solder flow to opposite side
>> during manufacture and the process requires all vias to be properly filled.
>> My experience with other fill methods has never yielded acceptable
>> results: either ended up with about 10% of vias not fully filled or with
>> material seepage resulting in manufacturing issues due to the impact on the
>> paste application process.
>> Going from V to VII will cost slightly more (3-4% here) but that is
>> insignificant in comparison to the costs of failures of assembled product.
>>
>> Hth,
>> Dave
>>

Thanks, but your post prompted another question:
(since you don't think Dave's reason is good enough)

When are caps on filled vias required by an application?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2