 
| Sender: |
|
| X-To: |
|
| Date: |
Fri, 28 Jan 2000 10:09:05 -0600 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Content-Type: |
multipart/mixed; boundary="------------74FA0801710964F68E2D98A8" |
| Organization: |
Dickey-john Corp. |
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Ed,
How ya doin'. I was wondering if the study you mention indicated any
gains at less rotation? Situation: you have a big assembly that you
are going to build custom palleting for but you don't have conveyor
width sufficient to crank the assembly around 45 degs. in the pallet.
Is it worth designing the pallet to hold the assembly at less of an
angle?
Gary Camac
Ed Popielarski wrote:
> Graham, We built several rotating pallets for a large contract
> manufacturer (is that abbreviated "ConMan"?) and they did extensive
> testing to determine optimum angle. The results were that 45 deg +/-
> 2deg is optimum and produced "significant" improvement. I can get you
> guys in touch if you want to persue further. Regards, Ed Popielarski
> QTA Machine
> 10 Mc Laren, Ste. D
> Irvine, Ca. 92618 Ph: 949-581-6601
> Fx: 949-581-2448 http://www.qta.net Check out our BGA Baller and
> Process Equipment Services!
|
|
|
