TECHNET Archives

February 2000

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
IPC-octuple
From:
Wanner Bernhard <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum.
Date:
Thu, 3 Feb 2000 19:19:53 +0100
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (685 bytes) , text/html (1992 bytes) 
hi technos,
in view of reducing all the references on the drawings and procurement doc's
I intend to write a kind of general technical spec.for all our pcb-suppliers
and sub-assemblers in following manner:

*       Std's to obtain during Design/Layout::
*       IPC-2221,
*       IPC-2222.
*       ... during pcb-manufacturing:
*       IPC-6011,
*       IPC-6012,
*       IPC-4101,
*       IPC-A-600.
*       ... during pcb-assembling:
*       J-STD-001,
*       IPC-A-610.
*       Default Requirements:
*       Class 2
*       Design-complexity: A
*       Others: see also IPC-6012, § 1.3.3.1

Do you (pcb-manuf. & -assemblers) would agree in such a pi-pa-po
general-spec?
Any coments appreciated.

Bernhard

ATOM RSS1 RSS2