TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Mon, 29 Apr 1996 18:01:05 +0100
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
From [log in to unmask] Wed May 1 14:
28:36 1996
Status:
O
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/3717
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
X-Status:
Resent-Message-ID:
<"EX2l01.0.mcA.NMFXn"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
"Terry Davey" <[log in to unmask]>
X-Loop:
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0uDwJ1-0000BuC; Mon, 29 Apr 96 12:00 CDT
X-Mailer:
Z-Mail (3.0.0 15dec93)
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)

We have a header in a prototype system with brass sprung contacts with gold 
plate over nickel, contacting pins which are also gold-plate over nickel.

This connector carries 3A, and is showing a strong tendency to increase in
contact resistance in field tests (up to 150 mOhm). Removing and refitting 
the connector takes the contact resistance back to "as new" (<40 m Ohm).. The 
connectors have been examined by a test lab and pronounced OK, with no 
contamination. No deposit or oxidation is visible on the surface.

Has anyone seen similar failure mechanism? What's the physics?


Terry Davey --------------------------------  [log in to unmask]  ------



ATOM RSS1 RSS2