Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0wLt4b-000BjkC; Mon, 28 Apr 97 11:14 CDT |
From [log in to unmask] Tue Apr 29 10: |
28:27 1997 |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 28 Apr 1997 12:24:38 -0400 (EDT) |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"oNhFM.0.EV7.mpCPp"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
X-Loop: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
sorry to but in on this one, but with the work i have done with several
customers in the past few weeks - opens and shorts - and a few other problems
diriving from dry film processing - is not an open and shut case.
i have found that both in processing dryfilm and LPI - board manufacturers
are not adhereing to actual breakpoint specs - recommended by their resist
and LPI suppliers. exposure step - actual developing solution concentration -
pH inflection points - correlating to the type of dry film and LPI being used
- rinse temperatures -
pressure - all play a big part in actual developing of the polymer.
either one or the other, or all of the above were out of sink when a
customer has had problems with dryfilm or LPI. though not as noticeable with
LPI - it makes a difference when your next step after LPI developing is an
electroless finish.
i have seen panels exiting developers with positive foot on component side
and negative foot on solder side - shorts on one but not the other. for some
strange reason - board manufacturers are more concerned about solution
contact time - either long or short ( usually depending on what they think is
wrong ) rather than the actual overall parameter of how the film is actually
to be processed. customers switching from a 1.5 film to a 2.0 mil film run
into tremendous problems for the first few days. but then, we only look at
the tech data sheet when all else goes wrong.
i would be very interested in knowing how actual parameters for processing
dryfil are implemented by board manufacturers. i sure hope it isn't - coppers
exposed - tape test shows only minor lifting - not much shadows - ok!!! let's
run it.
Rick Fudalewski
Atotech Canada Ltd
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To subscribe/unsubscribe send a message <to: [log in to unmask]> *
* with <subject: subscribe/unsubscribe> and no text in the body. *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask] *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|