TECHNET Archives

July 1997

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Received:
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0wo5eu-000BjaC; Tue, 15 Jul 97 06:20 CDT
Content-Type:
MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY=WebTV-Mail-153383518-6883
Old-Return-Path:
Date:
Tue, 15 Jul 1997 07:31:26 -0400
Precedence:
list
Resent-From:
Resent-Sender:
TechNet-request [log in to unmask]
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7BIT
From [log in to unmask] Mon Jul 21 10:
10:13 1997
X-Mailing-List:
<[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/13992
TO:
Return-Path:
<TechNet-request>
X-Status:
Status:
O
Resent-Message-ID:
<"WPc6m1.0.hxJ.Bqrop"@ipc>
Subject:
From:
[log in to unmask] (Josep Sajut)
X-Loop:
>From willli Tue Jul 15 06:
20:57 1997
MIME-Version:
1.0 (WebTV)
Message-Id:
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (293 bytes) , MESSAGE/RFC822 (1733 bytes)
Richard,

I would like to refine the question to a scenario of black versus brown
oxide too to understand the implications there.

Perhaps, you or the group could assist me in this difference.  I thought
reduced oxide to be an aid in preventing wedge voids and pink ring?

Thank you,
Josep

[log in to unmask]


ATOM RSS1 RSS2