Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 21 Mar 2013 13:00:33 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Message-ID: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="UTF-8" |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I've already shown them that this doesn't meet spec. It's not the only part that doesn't, we designed in a bunch that way, though not nearly as bad (a long story), What I really need to tell them is WHY the spec says there should be an IPC-610 joint (or even a IPC7351 design, for that matter). I've expressed my reliability concerns based on stress points, etc., but they look a part, and board, and solder, and think they can ship it and not worry. We will have about 1200 of these installed, they aren't seeing a problem.
Pete
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask]
______________________________________________________________________
|
|
|