 
| Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0tpwuR-00002oC; Fri, 23 Feb 96 06:47 CST |
| Encoding: |
17 TEXT |
| Old-Return-Path: |
|
| Date: |
Fri, 23 Feb 96 12:49:00 GMT |
| Precedence: |
list |
| Resent-From: |
|
| Message-ID: |
|
| X-Status: |
|
| Status: |
O |
| From [log in to unmask] Mon Feb 26 12: |
41:07 1996 |
| TO: |
|
| Return-Path: |
|
| Resent-Message-ID: |
<"r_RGF.0.ED1.hTRBn"@ipc> |
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Resent-Sender: |
|
| X-Loop: |
|
| X-Mailer: |
Microsoft Mail V3.0 |
| X-Mailing-List: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Are many companies using intrusive reflow ? Does anybody know if there is a
published IPC standard on implementing this technology , particularly in
relation to design guidelines, recommended stencil thicknesses etc.
Thanks,
Liam Brown
AMT Ireland
University of Limerick
National Technological Park
Plassey
Limerick
Ireland
Tel: 353-61-331588
Fax: 353-61-330316
Email: [log in to unmask]
|
|
|
