TECHNET Archives

1995

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Stephen C Joy <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 26 Sep 95 07:52:00 PDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (139 lines)

Text item: 

Isn't it true that the 30u" requirement was in effect long before Bellcore was a
gleam in Pa Bell's eye?

This may be one of those situations where we do it 'because that's the way we 
have always done it'.

I don't think that soft gold is an option, but if hard gold could be plated at 
10u" or so, the benefit to the manufacturing operation is the savings in 
materials and labor for tape/untape, rework for bad tape, etc. and the 
bottleneck costs. It would seem that there would be higher equipment costs for a
plating line, but automation would amortize the costs quickly.

This assumes that the life of the surface finish is acceptable, of course.

I have heard that thinner gold is currently being used on some SIMMs and DIMMs. 
Does anyone have any feedback on this?

Steve 
[log in to unmask]


Steve Joy asked:

>I have had requests for the reduction of the 30m" minimum for tab plating 
>recently. Where did the 30m" minimum average rule come from?

A rhetorical question? Bellcore, methinks. Check out TR-NWT-001217 Issue 1, 
Generic Requirments for Seperable Electrical Connectors Used in 
Telecommunications Hardware. It is also probably in TR-NWT-000078.

Paragraph 5.2.2.1 and table 5 specify 50 uin Au/50 uin Ni as "preferred" 
and 25 uin Au/50 uin Ni as "acceptable" for gold fingers, and for some 
reason 30 uin Au/50uin Ni for other (non-PWB) contacts.

You can find where to order these from http://www.bellcore.com or call 
1-800-521-CORE (908-699-5800 outside the USA).

I normally go into autodyslexia and start gibbering nonsense when trying to 
read more than a few paragraphs of the mil stds, but some of this Bellcore 
stuff actually makes sense. ;-)

Seriously, I respect Bellcore's technical competence in these matters 
implicitly. This very nice specification will give you everything they 
require both generically and in terms of performance/testing. I bet you 
could even get some test data from them on this matter if you call someone 
in Red Bank, NJ. (any Bellcore types lurking?)

>We have recently had to deal with some turnkey fabs having less than 
>30m"; in the range of 10m". We did porosity tests and accelerated aging, 
>etc. We could find no problems with the boards. (The nickel was around 
>50m".)

Well, you might also do some mating and unmating cycles, measure normal 
forces before and after testing, contact resistance changes, etc. And if 
memory serves, most thickness requirements have a safety margin to allow 
for porosity. If you did in fact have a very _non-porous_ gold finish, 
you'd probably see good test results with thinner coatings. Trouble is, 
specifying and checking porosity is a lot harder than thickness 
measurement. Likewise, hardness and wear resistance of the metal.

I can readily accept that finishes with thinner noble metals could pass a 
performance requirement, it just seems to me that any routine verification 
testing of this is difficult.

>The question is: Does anyone have any reliable data for gold thickness 
>vs. life for any products? ..like consumer; simms; other computer add 
>ons?

There is plentiful data on that subject. You may need to hit a local 
technical library, but this is one area which has had a lot of research. 
AT&T/Bellcore probably are the biggest experts. You may also ask some of 
your better connector suppliers. I know AMP has supplied me some 
unpublished technical articles on such matters in the past. I respect their 
opinion, too.

>I know that gold defects are not major hitters in PCB shops, but it is a 
>bottle neck, correct?

For me (a user of circuit boards), it seems that whether we put 10 uin or 
30 uin is not so much an issue of material cost, and so it must be 
throughput on the gold tab lines (jump in here, fab houses) that motivates 
fab houses to ask for relief.

Excuse me for quoting this old saw, but you know what the first three 
things you need to do are when your computer acts up?

1) check the connectors
2) check the connectors
3) check the connectors

I've seen sooooo many old PWB assemblies with discolored or worn looking 
gold tabs which have obviously oxidized. I've sprayed them with DeOxIt and 
seen them miraculosuly work fine. I know it costs more, and maybe I'm just 
obstinate, but I like gold connectors, like 'em thick too.

Forgive the boldness, but all the Interphase boards you buy will have 30 
microinches of gold on the seperable contacts. I believe the marginal 
additional cost will be repaid by the extra years the boards last, and the 
expectation they won't be returned for repair. But I DO agree we get some 
inquiries from vendors which imply we are asking for something unusual...


cheers,

Jerry Cupples
Interphase Corporation
Dallas, TX
http://www.iphase.com

Text item: External Message Header

The following mail header is for administrative use
and may be ignored unless there are problems.

***IF THERE ARE PROBLEMS SAVE THESE HEADERS***.

Cc: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Where did 30m" for Tab plating come from?
From: [log in to unmask] (Jerry Cupples)
To: Steve Joy <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 1995 19:32:58 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <ac8cef4b02021004badb@[157.175.110.24]>
X-Sender: [log in to unmask]
Received: from [157.175.110.24] (mac1_comm0) by crow.iphase.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
     id AA15055; Mon, 25 Sep 95 19:27:48 CDT
Received: from crow.iphase.com by iphase.com (4.1/1.34)
     id AA10104; Mon, 25 Sep 95 19:27:52 CDT
Received: from iphase.com by hermes.intel.com (5.65/10.0i); Mon, 25 Sep 95 17:29
:14 -0700
Received: from hermes.intel.com by relay.jf.intel.com with smtp
     (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0sxNtc-000twrC; Mon, 25 Sep 95 17:29 PDT



ATOM RSS1 RSS2