TECHNET Archives

December 2000

TechNet@IPC.ORG
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
TechNet <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Assembly DPMO Benchmarks or Targets
From:
Mark Orlowski <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 5 Dec 2000 12:44:37 -0600
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
"TechNet E-Mail Forum." <[log in to unmask]>, [log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines) 
Hey all,

I'd like to hear what some other folks are using for numeric DPMO targets
for assembly processes, such as:

SMT placement and/or reflow
Auto PTH insertion
Manual PTH insertion
Wave solder
Manual solder

We adhere to the preliminary IPC-9261 standard for calculation and now want
to benchmark the results.  Thanks.

Mark

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technet Mail List provided as a free service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d
To unsubscribe, send a message to [log in to unmask] with following text in
the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Technet
Search previous postings at: www.ipc.org > On-Line Resources & Databases > E-mail Archives
Please visit IPC web site (http://www.ipc.org/html/forum.htm) for additional
information, or contact Keach Sasamori at [log in to unmask] or 847-509-9700 ext.5315
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2