TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Date:
Wed, 28 Feb 1996 13:30 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type:
MULTIPART/MIXED
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (1942 bytes) , TEXT/PLAIN (1296 bytes)

     Thanks for your time and assistance.  It is greatly appreciated!
     
     Regards,
     
     Kevin Frasier
     Scientific Atlanta
     Atlanta, GA
     http://www.sciatl.com


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: FW: Stencil Printing Adhesive (for bottom side SMT)
Author:  [log in to unmask] at PMDF
Date:    2/28/96 10:51 AM


 ----------
From: Yuen, Michael
To: 'Technet'
Subject: FW: Stencil Printing Adhesive (for bottom side SMT) 
Date: Wednesday, February 28, 1996 8:20AM
Priority: High
     
Yes. I have had some success in the past working with a lactate adhesive. 
Major problem Included clean up and curing in the stencil apertures. Since 
January I have been working with MPM Corp. They have done a lot of work and 
research into printing adhesives. I feel they have solved the major problems 
I experienced with adhesives. Currently I am starting on some new adhesive 
process. The material I will be using is from Grace Specialty Polymers 
called Amicon D 125 f 5. Printer parameters are similar to that of printing 
paste.
     
Rosenthal, Ed
Process Engineer
EAC
[log in to unmask]
     
 ----------
From: TechNet-request
To: TechNet
Subject: Stencil Printing Adhesive (for bottom side SMT) 
Date: Tuesday, February 27, 1996 3:14PM
     
     To Whom It May Concern:
     
     Has anyone had any experience stencil printing adhesive for bottom side 
     chip components in a medium to high volume facility?  We are looking at 
     some very large quantities of chip components on the bottom side of the 
     boards and the present dispensing equipment will not be able to keep up 
     with the component placement rate.
     
     If so:  what is a recommended adhesive formulation?
     what are some recommended squeegee print speed and pressures?
      what are associated areas of risk stencil printing adhesive?
     
        Thank you for your time and consideration.
     
     Regards,
     
     Kevin Frasier




Received: from gatekeeper.sciatl.com (192.133.190.1)  by ALPHA.CORP.SCIATL.COM (PMDF V4.3-13 #7203)  id <[log in to unmask]>; Wed,  28 Feb 1996 11:36:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from smap@localhost by gatekeeper.sciatl.com for  <[log in to unmask]> via smapdV1.3 id LAA17096; Wed,  28 Feb 1996 11:37:58 -0500 Received: from ipc.org by gatekeeper.sciatl.com for <[log in to unmask]>  via SMTP (smap V1.3) id sma017080; Wed Feb 28 11:37:53 1996 Received: from ipc.org by simon.ipc.org via SMTP (940816.SGI.8.6.9/940406.SGI)  id IAA22298; Wed, 28 Feb 1996 08:17:56 -0800 Received: by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2) id m0tro79-00006CC; Wed,  28 Feb 96 09:48 CST Resent-date: Wed, 28 Feb 1996 08:17:56 -0800 Date: Wed, 28 Feb 1996 09:51:00 -0600 (CST) Resent-from: [log in to unmask] From: "Yuen, Mike" <[log in to unmask]> Subject: FW: Stencil Printing Adhesive (for bottom side SMT) Resent-sender: [log in to unmask] Resent-message-id: <"LLVX-2.0._q7.7b7Dn"@ipc> Message-id: <[log in to unmask]> X-Envelope-to: "Frasier, Kevin%SA-B03"@ccmail.corp.sciatl.com X-Mailer: Microsoft Mail V3.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Encoding: 46 TEXT Old-Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]> X-Mailing-List: <[log in to unmask]> archive/latest/2922 X-Loop: [log in to unmask] Precedence: list

ATOM RSS1 RSS2