TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Date:
Thu, 26 Dec 1996 00:31:17 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
Hey conveyorized oxide is not just possible, it is better, but the equipment
is very costly, and the tuning of the equipment can drive even the strong to
ask for assistance from Dr. Kevorkian.

However once it is tuned, and you have got material compatiblilty issues
sorted out, it just humms.  And produces the prettiest panels you have ever
seen.  NO MARKS!

I assisted in installing a line that was a continous
Develop-Etch-Strip-Clean-Microetch-Oxide line, with AOI, (Infrared, not
reflective) after oxide.  It was a thing of beauty, and once we got the
equipment sorted out, which took more than one attempt, in each area, it ran
well.

But oh vey, the cost was stunning, and the more fool proof the equipment, in
other words Titanium is better than plastic, the more expensive.

Rudy Sedlak
RD Chemical

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************
* If you are having a problem with the IPC TechNet forum please contact   *
* Dmitriy Sklyar at 847-509-9700 ext. 311 or email at [log in to unmask]      *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2