TECHNET Archives

November 2017

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
X-To:
Date:
Tue, 7 Nov 2017 19:40:19 -0600
Reply-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, Julie Silk <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
From:
Julie Silk <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (9 lines)
Have you heard of component terminations made of “pure iron”?  Not an alloy.  Any concerns that I should know about?  Seems like the CTE is low, although not as low as alloy 42.  These are plated with copper then Sn5Bi.  Rather odd...

Comments from our materials engineer:
Per existing guidelines, Alloy 42 is a high risk in SMT because of CTE mismatches with Sn.
CTE of pure Fe is 11.7 ppm/C
CTE of Cu or alloys ranges from 16.2 to 17.8 ppm/C
CTE of Sn is  23.5 ppm/C
CTE of pure Alloy 42  is  4.6 ppm/C

ATOM RSS1 RSS2