TECHNET Archives

March 2014

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
X-To:
"TechNet E-Mail Forum ([log in to unmask])" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 12 Mar 2014 16:04:13 +0000
Reply-To:
TechNet E-Mail Forum <[log in to unmask]>, "MacFadden, Todd" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From:
"MacFadden, Todd" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
Is anyone aware of standards for conducting and evaluating lead pull tests, and are there typical expected lead pull (or push) values for the common interconnects (i.e., gull wing, castellation, BGA, chip cap terminals, etc).

Perhaps there are too many variables -- e.g., type, finish, configuration and size of the lead; solder type, etc. -- to establish standard pull strength values. We've always just used relative comparison of values from sample lots against controls, but I'm wondering if there are typical expected pull strength values from industry we can reference.

I noted from MIL-STD-1580B: 10.1.1.2 Terminal strength. Perform a lead pull strength test on all parts (two parts minimum) in accordance with the applicable specification. But what is the "applicable specification" being referred to here?


Thanks in advance!
Todd MacFadden


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please contact helpdesk at x2960 or [log in to unmask] 
______________________________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2