TECHNET Archives

1996

TechNet@IPC.ORG

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Date:
Mon, 25 NOV 96 12:20:27 MST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
I have a few questions about an issue that started this whole eutectic
conversation.  What are the advantages of moving to a 62Sn/36Pb/2Ag solder
paste.  From the information that I have received from some solder paste
reps is that the popularity of the silver alloy paste has dwindled from about
50% of the volume to about 35%(according to Alpha, Kester, Indiun and Heraeus
reps).  Our supplier demands an extra half a cent a gram for a 2% silver
formula.
Our 63/37 solder joints are 3-4 times the strength requirements set by IPC,
thus an increase in strength is not cost effective with the high volumes of
paste we use.  And even though we have seen a very low number of palladium
silver components, I am not convinced that a 2% silver is going to buy us
much since palladium is supposed have a 100% dissolution rate with tin provided
your reflow profiles are set up correctly(with sufficient time over reflow).

Has anyone out there recently moved from a 63/37 to a 62/36/2 or visa versa,
and why.

          Steve A 

***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to:           *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text.        *
***************************************************************************



ATOM RSS1 RSS2