Received: |
by ipc.org (Smail3.1.28.1 #2)
id m0vPr6h-0000UoC; Tue, 19 Nov 96 08:24 CST |
Old-Return-Path: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 19 Nov 96 15:34: 0 PST |
Precedence: |
list |
Resent-From: |
|
Resent-Sender: |
|
X-Status: |
|
Status: |
O |
X-Mailing-List: |
|
TO: |
|
Return-Path: |
<TechNet-request> |
Resent-Message-ID: |
<"dbNvj2.0.DU8.wCSao"@ipc> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
X-Loop: |
|
From [log in to unmask] Tue Nov 19 10: |
09:06 1996 |
X-Mailer: |
SelectMAIL 1.2 |
Message-Id: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi technetter,
I would like to have some feedback on how a "not approved" BGA solder joint look like" (except
for an open or bridge). I am referring to eutectic collapsable solder joints.
Can you have "too fat" or "too thin" joints?
Hans Bogren
Ericsson Telecom AB
Sweden
***************************************************************************
* TechNet mail list is provided as a service by IPC using SmartList v3.05 *
***************************************************************************
* To unsubscribe from this list at any time, send a message to: *
* [log in to unmask] with <subject: unsubscribe> and no text. *
***************************************************************************
|
|
|